The Final Four and who should win

The Final Four is rapidly approaching and usually I would be thrilled. Though it seems the four teams that are left are all in the Top-10 of schools I don't like. So let's break down the pros and cons of each of the teams winning it all.

1. Kentucky - the overall favorite of the tournament and who most people expect to win.
Pro if they win: John Calipari is about to get caught for another NCAA violation/scandal that will cause Kentucky to vacate all of its wins for this season.

Con if they win: I will have to hear about Anthony Davis all year and look at this for the year ....

*Shivers*

2. Louisville - a team that is coached by someone who looks like My Cousin Vinny.

Pro if they win: They don't get a lot of over hyped attention during the season so I wouldn't be extremely disgusted if they win and I had to hear about them for a few months, things could be worse.

Con if they win: They are apart of the Big East and then once again the Big East can argue they have the best conference. When you have 40 teams in a 68 team tournament, odds are you are going to have a team from your conference win it.....

3. Kansas - They beat Purdue.....

Pro if they win: Purdue can say they almost beat (and probably should of) the winners of the NCAA tournament. It's not the best thing to say but it's better than losing to VCU.

Con if they win: We are going to hear more BS stories like this that no one cares about. Stupid Kansas. That kid should go outside....

4. aOSU - Smh

Pro if they win: The B1G wins the NCAA Tournament.

Con if they win: I could write a book about this. First, they are a terrible school. Also, when they are in first place in the nation they can't sell out their own basketball arena. Jared Sullinger is terrible. He complains every time someone blocks his shot.....

Also, Thad Matta has been considered a good coach in the B1G and now if he wins the NCAA Tounament he will be considered a much better coach and frankly, he shouldn't be.

So the result, who should win?

Winner: Kentucky!

Why?

Simple, Calipari will cheat or something once again. The win wont count and the official winner of the 2012 NCAA Tournament will be no one, and that way, we all win .... except Thad...

Jared Sullinger: Most overrated college "athlete"

Jared Sullinger, what can I say, I am not a fan. For those who don't know, he is the sophomore forward on aO$U (a Ohio State University) and if you have never seen him play, you should.

Basically the way he plays is,

• Gets the ball
• Pulls out a gun
• Shoots the defender
• Complains that there is blood on him
• A foul is called on the defender as they let him put in a layup.

I wish I was kidding but it is pretty much how it goes. This "top athlete" is only good because of the calls he gets. I am a graduate of Purdue and naturally had to watch him play as Purdue faced off against aO$U. Every time he was stopped by good defense he would sit on the ground and cry. The refs would eventually give him the call. It was disgusting. He couldn't shoot well from the field once good defense was played against him.

I do believe the B1G Ten conference is the best basketball conference in the nation, but players like this disgust me. It is suppose to be a tough, physical conference. When you have someone who cries after every play and demands respect, even though it has never been earned, it is annoying to watch.

If you ever get to see the giant baby play, you should, just once. Just so you can see the wrong way to play basketball. If you want to watch the right way, watch any other athlete that is willing to play defense and play tough, pretty much any other school.