Showing posts with label kentucky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kentucky. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

John Calipari partially ruins college basketball

All the latest talk is about how Calipari finally got the National Championship he deserved, please, he doesn't deserve anything.

Deadspin had a good article about it all, though a few people on the editor's board are Calipari/Kentucky fans, so that skews things a bit.

Anyway, John Calipari is a pimp. He is a brutally honest pimp that uses the possibility of athletes making tons of money if they go to his school for the one-and-done program.

A few years back the NCAA changed the rules so you had to go to college for one year before the pros. They said because the best talents were skipping over college and were hurting the game. Is it really though?

I don't care to watch superstar athletes, I want to see good competition and teamwork. That doesn't happen with teams that have a superstar and a bunch of nobodies whose only job is to sit there. Save that for the NBA that no one watches.

Even though Calipari always had good teams, he never won the championship. It was something that basketball purists could hang their hat on. You can't win it all with inexperience. You need seniors and juniors to win the big one.

In 2008 Calipari's Memphis team proved it.


A team that couldn't convert. Now the 2012 Kentucky team almost did it once again, unfortunately Anthony "I am shit" (or was the un-classy comment he yelled, I am the shit, which ever) Davis helps lead a team to prove Calipari's system can work.

Though he couldn't shoot from the field what so ever, but he was able to rebound. Good thing that's important in a professional league that doesn't play defense.... just sayin.

So it is sad to see that a team of one-and-dones can win a championship, even if it takes Calipari well over a decade to win it. Like they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Also, any coach that says having six kids getting drafted was the greatest day in UK history, greater than the days where they won its titles, just doesn't seem right in my mind.

Side note, I don't like coach Bob Knight, though I like him a bit more now.

Knight wont mention the name Kentucky. Also, he never has anything good to say about Calipari. When asked which one of the No.1 seeds will exit the tournament early, his response, "the one from the SEC."

He will continuously mock its "student-athletes", referring that they never go to class because an education means nothing to them.

If you get the chance Google it and find an article like this.

Lastly, I would like to leave you with a quote that my friend, who is a Kansas fan, said.

" I'm reading Machiavelli for a second time right now and he points out that kingdoms won by internal power are greater than those won by mercenaries."

Couldn't agree more.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The Final Four and who should win

The Final Four is rapidly approaching and usually I would be thrilled. Though it seems the four teams that are left are all in the Top-10 of schools I don't like. So let's break down the pros and cons of each of the teams winning it all.

1. Kentucky - the overall favorite of the tournament and who most people expect to win.
Pro if they win: John Calipari is about to get caught for another NCAA violation/scandal that will cause Kentucky to vacate all of its wins for this season.

Con if they win: I will have to hear about Anthony Davis all year and look at this for the year ....

*Shivers*

2. Louisville - a team that is coached by someone who looks like My Cousin Vinny.




Pro if they win: They don't get a lot of over hyped attention during the season so I wouldn't be extremely disgusted if they win and I had to hear about them for a few months, things could be worse.

Con if they win: They are apart of the Big East and then once again the Big East can argue they have the best conference. When you have 40 teams in a 68 team tournament, odds are you are going to have a team from your conference win it.....

3. Kansas - They beat Purdue.....



Pro if they win: Purdue can say they almost beat (and probably should of) the winners of the NCAA tournament. It's not the best thing to say but it's better than losing to VCU.

Con if they win: We are going to hear more BS stories like this that no one cares about. Stupid Kansas. That kid should go outside....

4. aOSU - Smh

Pro if they win: The B1G wins the NCAA Tournament.

Con if they win: I could write a book about this. First, they are a terrible school. Also, when they are in first place in the nation they can't sell out their own basketball arena. Jared Sullinger is terrible. He complains every time someone blocks his shot.....

Also, Thad Matta has been considered a good coach in the B1G and now if he wins the NCAA Tounament he will be considered a much better coach and frankly, he shouldn't be.

So the result, who should win?

Winner: Kentucky!

Why?

Simple, Calipari will cheat or something once again. The win wont count and the official winner of the 2012 NCAA Tournament will be no one, and that way, we all win .... except Thad...